While watching the comments of Marty’s group, which has declared itself the “Independent Scientology Group”, I have been waiting for them to, well, implement Scientology.
I think it’s great they are auditing each other and do Scientology training. Really. If someone wants Scientology auditing or training, and someone else provides that, well that’s the way it should be. If no one is harmed, it’s nobody’s business but theirs.
But what about the other Scientology technologies? You know, the abusive stuff — all those “enemy” lists, “Suppressive Person” declares, disconnection orders, “PTS” declares, punishments, lower conditions and all that stuff.
After all, these are key parts of L. Ron Hubbard’s technology, Hubbard said so.
Is Hubbard’s all-important Ethics Tech not being applied by this group? Did they realize these were primary policies for abuse? Are they altering Scientology to make it “kinder and gentler”?
Ah, not so much. Nothing of Hubbard’s can be neglected or modified, that’s the rules.
However, they do realize it would look bad if they started declaring people suppressive or PTS, so, like Hubbard banning the words “fair game” while at the same time urging its use, so this “Independent Scientology Group” simply doesn’t use those words.
The people they have determined to be “suppressives”? Apparently, they use the label “haters”. Suppressive groups are, therefore, called “hater sites” or “hater blogs”.
Gee, isn’t this the same code word, and the exact same meaning that the Church of Scientology uses for “suppressives” when they try to hide Scientology’s abuse from “wogs” (non-Scientologists)? Why, yes it is!
If you’ve been labelled a “hater” by this group, congratulations! Apparently, you’ve been declared a suppressive. No “Independent Scientology Group” member may talk with you. They are supposed to disconnect from you.
And how about declaring people “PTS” (Potential Trouble Source — someone “connected to a suppressive”)? Are they implementing that bit of “tech”?
Yes, indeed. Look at how, and at whom, they direct the word “natterer”. It’s a code word for “has overts” (has done “bad” things), and for “PTS”.
So you have “natterers” and “natter boards” to indicate those who might still be Scientologists, but who are not considered “pure”. You see, these “natterers” have been corrupted by the “haters” to say bad things about Hubbard and/or Scientology.
Good Scientologists will not associate or communicate to these PTS people or groups, but there is still hope that, if the “natterers” disconnect from the “haters”, they might still be recovered to “pure” Scientology.
And so it starts: the suppression of divergent thinking; the suppression of any “negative” information; the suppression of any disagreement, discussion, debate, questions or doubts. These are key policies for creating and enforcing cult-thought-control. No group attempting to implement all of Scientology would ever neglect these vital thought control policies.
But they hide it because, in Scientology, if something you do is considered unacceptable by society, you just change its name and continue doing it. (Apparently, they think “wogs” are too stupid to figure that out.)
Now don’t get me wrong. Scientologists do have the right to say what they want, make “enemies” lists and declare people “haters” and “natterers”. That is covered under freedom of religion and freedom of speech.
But I sincerely doubt that many Scientologists, escaping from the abuses and cult-thought-control of the Church of Scientology, are looking for someone else to control them.
This group is selling a straitjacket for the mind — but freedom to think, freedom to look and freedom to disagree is just too precious for any intelligent person to buy that “tech”.